Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | TuneIn | RSS
The latest episode of the IN-CJ podcast, Just Psychology, brought together leading forensic psychologists to explore the role of psychology in the criminal justice system, examining its application in different jurisdictions and the challenges that come with shaping evidence-based practices. Hosted by John Scott, the discussion featured contributions from Julie Oliver, forensic director at the Georgia Department of Behavioural Health and Developmental Disabilities, Nic Bowes, forensic psychology practitioner and academic at Cardiff Metropolitan University, and Jo Clarke, founder of Petros and former forensic psychologist in the UK prison system.
The conversation opened with reflections on the different routes into forensic psychology and the variety of roles that psychologists play in legal and correctional settings. Across the United States and the United Kingdom, the pathway to qualification requires years of training, but the professional identity of forensic psychologists varies.
In the US, psychologists working in forensic settings often operate under a broader clinical framework, whereas in the UK, forensic psychology is a distinct discipline with structured training and accreditation processes. Despite these differences, all speakers agreed that forensic psychology remains a field that professionals often enter unexpectedly, drawn in by an interest in human behaviour and its intersection with the law.
A significant theme of the discussion was the role forensic psychologists play in legal proceedings and offender rehabilitation. Julie Oliver provided insight into her work assessing individuals for competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility, highlighting the challenges of evaluating mental state within the confines of legal definitions. The conversation also touched on the wider responsibilities of forensic psychologists, including the treatment of individuals found not guilty by reason of insanity and the complexities of preparing people for reintegration into society after periods of incarceration.
The comparison between forensic practice in the US and the UK led to an exploration of the wider justice systems in which psychologists operate. The speakers noted the impact of different legal frameworks, cultural attitudes towards crime and rehabilitation, and the availability of psychological services in prisons and community settings. While forensic psychology is well established in both countries, its integration into probation, youth justice, and preventative work remains inconsistent.
The discussion raised questions about how psychologists can contribute more effectively to early intervention strategies and the development of policies that support diversion from the criminal justice system, particularly for individuals with complex needs.
A particularly striking part of the conversation focused on the psychological wellbeing of those working in forensic settings. The panellists acknowledged the emotional demands of the job and the need for better institutional support for practitioners who regularly deal with trauma and distressing case material.
While some organisations provide access to wellbeing resources, there was consensus that a culture shift is needed to ensure that psychological safety is treated with the same priority as physical safety in workplaces. The discussion also touched on the need for greater diversity within forensic psychology, ensuring that the profession reflects the communities it serves and is accessible to those from different backgrounds.
As the conversation drew to a close, the speakers reflected on the broader role of forensic psychologists in shaping the justice system. From influencing legal decisions to supporting offenders in changing their behaviour, psychology has the potential to inform a more nuanced and effective approach to justice. There was also an emphasis on the importance of engaging with policymakers, legal professionals, and the wider public to ensure that psychological expertise is recognised as a valuable tool in creating safer communities.
This episode of Just Psychology provided a thoughtful and reflective discussion on the ways forensic psychology can contribute to justice systems internationally. By sharing insights from different jurisdictions and professional perspectives, the conversation reinforced the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in shaping effective criminal justice practices.